Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 16:22:45 +0100 From: se@zpr.uni-koeln.de (Stefan Esser) To: Richard J Kuhns <rjk@sparcmill.grauel.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: One problem && one question Message-ID: <199602151522.AA02983@Sysiphos> In-Reply-To: Richard J Kuhns <rjk@sparcmill.grauel.com> "Re: One problem && one question" (Feb 15, 9:58)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 15, 9:58, Richard J Kuhns wrote: } Subject: Re: One problem && one question } Justin T. Gibbs writes: } I'm afraid the card IS double probed. } I built and booted a kernel with the following in the config file: } } controller bt0 } controller bt1 at isa? port "IO_BT0" bio irq ? vector bt_isa_intr } } The PCI probe found the card first as bt0; the ISA probe found it later as } bt1. In the interest of minimizing possible damage to my file systems, I'm } afraid I hit the reset button while the bt1 portion was ``waiting for scsi } devices to settle'. We definitely need conflict check code that covers all bus types ... (And I have part of that ready.) But the BusLogic would still be double probed, I suppose, since it responds to 0x330 ISA probes but doesn't announce that port range as active to the PCI driver. This is a very bad thing, and the card seems to severely violate the PCI specs ... Regards, STefan -- Stefan Esser, Zentrum fuer Paralleles Rechnen Tel: +49 221 4706021 Universitaet zu Koeln, Weyertal 80, 50931 Koeln FAX: +49 221 4705160 ============================================================================== http://www.zpr.uni-koeln.de/~se <se@ZPR.Uni-Koeln.DE>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602151522.AA02983>