From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 21:50:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5459D408; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 21:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA1E32275; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 21:50:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1407534614; l=2290; s=domk; d=Haakh.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date; bh=3xKCYNLyl1rLXKXo3c/OCzaAioQ=; b=cHQA6iBPQBLUTLO7WlYQcOinOuBqcsbnvGTLbgxNiCsdTmtsa642AoedKMCPxSm/yBR EAKatpD+xfO2Lo/BD6uy7bC09LVY28uC2WNrHOYqyOGEeEEssqokqsJG8o+MTR+83inmL bFZtSJkX6/0wVnSMv/fajEzijVaU06e+MH4= X-RZG-AUTH: :LWQcbViwW/e6OTbW0dHzwKkCepEs/ThuRG8zpeuciRNkwehqPJJjMpQyueBuuw== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from abaton.Haakh.de (p57A73BAC.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.167.59.172]) by post.strato.de (RZmta 35.3 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPA id L060f6q78LoDRS2; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 23:50:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Crabberio.Haakh.de (crabberio.Haakh.de [192.168.63.16]) by abaton.Haakh.de (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s78LoChB009335; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 23:50:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bugReporter@Haakh.de) Message-ID: <53E54614.7090108@Haakh.de> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 23:50:12 +0200 From: "Dr. A. Haakh" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis Subject: Re: build of de-apache-openoffice-4.1.0 broken References: <201408080112.s781BvIO044474@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201408080112.s781BvIO044474@gw.catspoiler.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 21:50:19 -0000 Am 08.08.2014 03:11, Don Lewis schrieb: > On 7 Aug, To: bugReporter@Haakh.de wrote: >> On 7 Aug, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> on this system >>> >>> FreeBSD Crabberio.Haakh.de 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #0 r269301: >>> Wed Jul 30 18:36:57 CEST 2014 >>> toor@Crabberio.Haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRABBERIO amd64 >>> >>> I get this error: >>> >>> ===================================================== >>> ERROR: ERROR: unopkg sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true >>> 2>&1 | failed! >>> in function: register_extensions >>> ************************************************** >>> in function: register_extensionsstopping log at Thu Aug 7 09:41:29 2014 >>> dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.archive' >>> >>> 1 module(s): >>> instsetoo_native >>> need(s) to be rebuilt >>> >>> Reason(s): >>> >>> ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making >>> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4/work/aoo-4.1.0/main/instsetoo_native/util >>> >>> When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build >>> by running: >>> >>> build --from instsetoo_native >>> >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop. >>> make: stopped in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-4 >>> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa >>> /tmp/portupgrade20140807-77714-1z11122 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade >>> UPGRADE_PORT=de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=4.0.1_4 make >>> BATCH=yes >>> ** Fix the problem and try again. >>> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>> ! editors/openoffice-4 (de-apache-openoffice-4.0.1_4) (unknown >>> build error) >>> ===================================================== >>> >>> Any ideas? >> I just noticed the same failure on portsmon (also 10.0). I've done most >> of my builds on 8.4-STABLE and have never seen this problem. I'm not >> running 10.0 on anything here, but I did have success with 11.0-CURRENT >> a while back. I run that again to see if I can reproduce the problem. >> >> I did a web search and didn't find anything that looked relevant. > I just broke for me on 11.0-CURRENT as well. That's a regression > because it was working before. > > I see that portsmon was able to build it on 9.x. > Any idea what might be the cause?