From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Mar 20 16:32:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from enya.clari.net.au (enya.clari.net.au [203.8.14.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0B037BC7B for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 16:32:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danny@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (danny@localhost) by enya.clari.net.au (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA17905; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:32:33 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from danny@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: enya.clari.net.au: danny owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 11:32:33 +1100 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" X-Sender: danny@enya.clari.net.au To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Cc: jessica@clari.net.au Subject: RAID and root filesystem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I'm about to implement a RAID system for a customer webserver. The customer is on edge about not having RAID on /. They want to go to 4.0 to get RAID on /, but I feel that 4.0 is a bit premature, since they are "Desperately Seeking Stability". Can other people please comment on: * 4.0 with AMI RAID, apache, mysql in a Dell PIII-600 * as above with 3.4 - what have others done to achieve redundant root filesystems? Traffic rate is about 200,000 hits per day, with a very large proportion driven through perl scripts. Thanks, Danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message