Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:31:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 270989] print/ghostscript10: adds libgs.so; connects to USES and DEFAULT_VERSIONS facilities; flavorized Message-ID: <bug-270989-7788-BORwjc1Ppz@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-270989-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-270989-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D270989 --- Comment #15 from Michael Osipov <michael.osipov@siemens.com> --- A it turns out, Debian does exactly what I have observed. The port flavors don't make sense: ghostscript (10.0.0~dfsg-8) unstable; urgency=3Dmedium * QA upload * debian/: No longer build with dynamic modules (Closes: #1023330) - X11 support is now part of ghostscript and ghostcript-x is a transitional package. https://packages.debian.org/sid/ghostscript-x where libgs depends on X: https://packages.debian.org/sid/libgs10 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Installed Debian 12 Testing: GS is by default linked with X11 libs. Default device is x11alpha and when you invoke GS interactively it of course tries = to connect to an X server. 14 ports require X11 which Ghostscript. So it really looks to be that this should be a port option, the question whether it should be default or not. Currently, 156 ports define X11 and 104 of them enable X11 by default. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-270989-7788-BORwjc1Ppz>