From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 25 13:23:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55AA16A404; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from mx2.imp.ch (mx2.imp.ch [157.161.9.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57CF13C4C8; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from dan.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by pop.imp.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_imp) with ESMTP id l1PCsKie013031; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:54:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:54:20 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: <20070225104709.S36322@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: <20070225134508.C18301@godot.imp.ch> References: <20070224213111.GB41434@xor.obsecurity.org> <346a80220702242100i7ec22b5h4b25cc7d20d03e98@mail.gmail.com> <20070225054120.GA47059@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070225104709.S36322@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 22:34:55 +0000 Cc: cokane@cokane.org, smp@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 13:23:12 -0000 Hi, > It would be really great if we could find "workload owners" who would > maintain easy-to-run benchmark configurations and also run them regularly on > a fixed hardware configuration over a long time publishing results and > testing patches. Kris has done this for SQL benchmarks to great effect, I'm interested in such a workload test. At my job we run various other servers which have a classic virus/antispam environment. And unfortunatly clamd behaves not very well on FreeBSD (see mails to freebsd-threads), and this happens even on 2-CPU systems. I think its not very difficult to make a scripted load test, with 2/4/6/8/16/32 scans in parallel, with ULE or BSD scheduler. Btw: what is the best method to profile a threaded application to see where it spends the most CPU time ? Martin