From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 11 02:54:52 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3849F400
 for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:54:52 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com
 [209.85.214.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03455991
 for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:54:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id oi10so1285596obb.40
 for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:54:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=nqCLbnRf3f0+SMFsLjxXFOzTbqzLX2AF4FM3g5XO0Ac=;
 b=iyVCiy0IbrcoY76jU/DBNjhkN4HGIkWFR0S2amf2oIfsLo981UbQDWq9JkjNJjr1ld
 QWxOl1jiST9y4NyFznaI0eEmWHmU2zlZkU6OS0ktamDGg24Bvn/tAwQO6zuP0uCHxaM+
 5kONOEsHXe1gniAJTDxc7tBM2Lj2NmOUKqGNE7ONnxUbGdMl6OFIqKXpAD2hWAnF0YnV
 y3h7xL7hNdOmUo9npMRllblhzV1fzlm4AMPsahHrVxUrcE3RkgVbmUHFj8QVWVJDPk7W
 XDOVT+zkff1Uo5KYMFyRAOF7vzAohPcZIxY/5vBkBi/N6aaSDr9bQTXEIxvw/W3A2DGx
 yTuw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.182.101 with SMTP id ed5mr10960584obc.23.1357872885461;
 Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:54:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.128.68 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:54:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301101929430.23007@wonkity.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301101929430.23007@wonkity.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:54:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFMmRNw++dNNhYfUUWH4P1pUoO3koC+dTKR_PFVbkJCA2p0YMA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: VirtualBox kernel modules
From: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>
To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
 <freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-emulation>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 02:54:52 -0000

As I recall, a make installkernel will first mv /boot/kernel
/boot/kernel.old

Should ports put modules in /boot/modules to avoid this kind of thing?