Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 08:45:46 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic in FFS/4.0 as of yesterday Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902190844430.61913-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9902181859110.24373-100000@feral-gw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Oh, btw- I should clarify a little about this test and some spice to the > mix... The same test on a system that is 25% of the cpu power and 25% of > the memory running solaris 2.7 Intel not only successfully has always runs > this test but also retains a quite acceptable responsiveness. Please don't > make me claim Slowlaris is better! I'm sure that something very wrong is happening, don't worry. Hopefully, I will be able to see something. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9902190844430.61913-100000>