From owner-freebsd-security Sun May 2 5:12:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CEA15440 for ; Sun, 2 May 1999 05:12:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from greenpeace.grondar.za (greenpeace.grondar.za [196.7.18.132]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA35957; Sun, 2 May 1999 14:12:04 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greenpeace.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01249; Sun, 2 May 1999 14:11:57 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199905021211.OAA01249@greenpeace.grondar.za> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" , Robert Watson , Poul-Henning Kamp , The Tech-Admin Dude , Brian Beaulieu , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Blowfish/Twofish In-Reply-To: Your message of " Sun, 02 May 1999 02:32:55 MST." <23332.925637575@zippy.cdrom.com> References: <23332.925637575@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 14:11:56 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > Erm, one of the goals of PAM is to support *multiple* encryption > methods, so why not do a PAM module for each and let the administrator > decide which authentication methods to support in /etc/pam.conf? Hear, hear! M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message