From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 13 03:35:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C43106566B for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170FF8FC17 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p6D3ZZot041457; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:35:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id p6D3ZZpk041454; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:35:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:35:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Kostik Belousov In-Reply-To: <20110712111108.GG43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Message-ID: References: <20110708184413.GD48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110709174612.GN48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4E1A0362.8050808@gmail.com> <20110710212339.GO43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4E1B56E7.4090801@gmail.com> <20110712081704.GB43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4E1C295D.2080008@gmail.com> <20110712111108.GG43872@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:35:35 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel GPU kernel driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:35:36 -0000 On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Kostik Belousov wrote: > My observation is that people who report (some) success with the patch > all using Ironlake machines. This is not much surprising due to my test > machine being Ironlake. I just hold a little hope that there is somebody > who got it working on !Ironlake. Would it be useful to test on a 965GM/X3100?