Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 Aug 1998 23:29:40 -0700
From:      x7 <x7@sclegacy.com>
To:        John <freebsd-root@i-zone.demon.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: US robotics 56k modems
Message-ID:  <35C7FBD3.A8B55491@sclegacy.com>
References:  <199808012337.QAA04094@hub.freebsd.org> <199808020206.VAA08645@cedar.netten.net> <1bvo3SAfD%2Bx1EwiE@i-zone.demon.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I thought V.90 is already out.

John wrote:

> In article <199808020206.VAA08645@cedar.netten.net>, Michael Horton
> <handh@netten.net> writes
> >My guess is that the V.90 is a bad standard or that X2 and Kflex
> >manufacturers implement it very poorly.  (I have heard that the final
> >standard is not expected until the end of the year and what is now called
> >the V.90 standard is actually an interim standard.)
>
> No.
>
> v90 is due (from what I've heard) for ratification (ITUT I think)
> sometime in September. v90 draft proposal was issued earlier. X2 and k56
> flex are proprietary - i.e. they are not 'standards'. v90 presently is
> not ratified, and therefore not a standard. It is a draft proposal only.
>
> So what are these v90 modems? Perhaps they followed the draft. I would
> wait until the actual standard was ratified fully if I were you.
>
> --
> John
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



-- x7
x7@sclegacy.com
http://www.sclegacy.com
ICQ UIN: 5660459  || EGN #: 90



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35C7FBD3.A8B55491>