From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 20 02:26:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7947E16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 02:26:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546E243D3F for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 02:26:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id j2K2QOi6000367; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:26:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) (authenticated bits=0)j2K2QMSr002019; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 18:26:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5d683828050319174485fb36a@mail.gmail.com> References: <423C90AB.9030105@samsco.org> <200503192219.j2JMJDb6025915@cvs.openbsd.org> <5d683828050319160171ca7627@mail.gmail.com> <8d1ffb5ad4233d7ca6499fb2c72c38db@mac.com> <5d6838280503191620387146c6@mail.gmail.com> <5d683828050319174485fb36a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:26:21 -0500 To: Jason Crawford X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) cc: misc@openbsd.org cc: freebsd list cc: Theo de Raadt Subject: Re: Adaptec AAC raid support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 02:26:25 -0000 On Mar 19, 2005, at 8:44 PM, Jason Crawford wrote: > So something is only unacceptable if it has been previously talked > about on a freebsd mailing list? Wow that's one big ego there. If it > was acceptable, none of this would be happening, but it is. [ ... ] You are the one making claims about what FreeBSD users find unacceptable, at least supposedly. The complete lack of evidence you've provided so far to support your assertion is underwhelming. I don't care if you look at the mailing lists, Usenet postings, web sites, or anything else that can be independently confirmed. Your words alone lack credibility. -- -Chuck