From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 06:40:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AC816A41F for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:40:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0BA43D45 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:40:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8J6dHMe096222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:39:17 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id j8J6bxu6095963; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:37:59 +0700 (ICT) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:37:59 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200509190637.j8J6bxu6095963@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: peter@dataloss.nl In-reply-to: <20050919063322.GA17888@dataloss.nl> (message from Peter van Dijk on Mon, 19 Sep 2005 08:33:22 +0200) References: <20050919.004531.92589257.mshindo@mshindo.net> <432D9249.9090202@mac.com> <432DA0AC.8010802@thedarkside.nl> <432DA922.5030303@errno.com> <200509190606.j8J66JbO095192@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <20050919063322.GA17888@dataloss.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARP behavior in FreeBSD vs Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:40:37 -0000 > 'Enabling' bridging is a no-op.. However, when you -configure- a > couple of interfaces together in a bridge, they share this behaviour; > but this is correct as bridging is supposed to effectively merge the > chosen interfaces into one. This does not affect any other interfaces, > which makes it substantially different from the Linux behaviour. OK, enabling bridge is useless unless you bridge a pair of interfaces :) But that ARP thing happens also with interfaces that are not part of the bridge! Even if the interfaces are ifconfiged NOARP. Olivier