From owner-freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org Wed Jun 3 12:59:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fortran@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB62C336BC7 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49cTWZ55qCz4KF1 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AF1A3336BC6; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: fortran@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE4F336846 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49cTWZ4Gygz4KTc for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E3F4E2F8 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 053CxMJO007556 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:59:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 053CxMtf007555 for fortran@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:59:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fortran@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 246887] catch Mk/Uses/fortran.mk up to bsd.gcc.mk r301973 Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 12:59:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tijl@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Fortran on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 12:59:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D246887 Tijl Coosemans changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org | --- Comment #5 from Tijl Coosemans --- (In reply to Mark Linimon from comment #3) > My current view is that the case of USE_GCC=3D and USES+=3Dfort= ran does not even work now. That is somewhat intentional. We want all Fortran ports to be compiled with the same compiler and that implies the same USE_GCC. Not doing so is asking for trouble with runtime libraries. If a port needs a newer version it sho= uld set IGNORE directing the user to modify his DEFAULT_VERSIONS. If it's stuc= k on an older version it should probably set BROKEN with a similar message. If I were the maintainer of bsd.gcc.mk I would do the same there. It's sim= pler to maintain. It makes it more likely that users have only one version of g= cc installed and therefore have fewer problems with runtime libraries which me= ans there are fewer support questions to deal with. And marking old ports BROK= EN allows us to get rid of them faster, or it might incentivise their maintain= ers to fix them with newer gcc faster. Anyway, what I'm trying to say is, please don't introduce any of the bsd.gc= c.mk "magic" in fortran.mk. Making it possible to choose "10-devel" as gcc defa= ult would be nice though. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=