Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 18:16:15 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 277204] *: ports misusing WITH_CCACHE_BUILD and NO_CCACHE Message-ID: <bug-277204-7788-8jmKpWp7Oo@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-277204-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-277204-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277204 Gleb Popov <arrowd@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arrowd@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Gleb Popov <arrowd@FreeBSD.org> --- You're correct in your analysis, Benjamin. WITH_CCACHE_BUILD uses should be fixed and I even suspect that bsd.ccache.mk should become Features/ccache.mk Matthias, I took a look on graphics/rawtherapee and wonder why all these kn= obs are really there. Using GCC, binutils, forcing LTO, smoke-testing in post-install and replaying what bsd.ccache.mk does seems all wrong to me. Comments mention GCC 9, which probably means that all this stuff was put in= the port long ago and might be not relevant anymore. Anyways, there is a new 5.10 release available, can you please look into it? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-277204-7788-8jmKpWp7Oo>