From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 18 2:13:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E4137B401; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:13:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from fatpipi.cirx.org (fatpipi.cirx.org [211.23.144.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7D443EC2; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 02:13:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clive@tongi.org) Received: from fatpipi.cirx.org.rose (nullmail@localhost.cirx.org [127.0.0.1]) by fatpipi.cirx.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id gBIADYZ0090709; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:13:34 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from clive@tongi.org) Received: (nullmailer pid 90707 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:13:34 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 18:13:33 +0800 From: Clive Lin To: Dima Dorfman Cc: ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/45755: /usr/ports/net/dictd does not build, at least on 4.7-RELEASE Message-ID: <20021218101333.GA90562@fatpipi.cirx.org> References: <200212180830.gBI8U4V8042817@freefall.freebsd.org> <20021218085050.GA23253@trit.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021218085050.GA23253@trit.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD i386 X-PGP-key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA008C03E User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:50:50AM +0000, Dima Dorfman wrote: > [cc'd to ports in the hope that someone will make portmgr reply] > > Clive Lin wrote: > > I think it's impossible to fix dictd on RELENG_4. > > I beg to differ. The attached patch makes it compile on RELENG_4, but Wooha. I admitted that I only took a 3 secs inspectin in wctype.h and made my conclusion. Dictd is your baby, and surely you know how to teach him to behave well ;) > possibly breaks UTF8 dictionaries (I haven't tried). It does not Currently we have 2 dictd-database in ports tree. One is chinese/dictd-database, and another one is net/dictd-database. Both of them are not utf8 dictionaries. For an average ports+dictd* consumer, lacking of utf8 support is not harmful. > affect functionality on 5.0. I've sent this to portmgr three times > (this message is the fourth), but have heard no reply. > > I think breaking a new feature is better than breaking it completely. /me ping portmgr BTW, isn't fixing breakage on RELENG_4 implicitly Ok'ed ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message