From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 16 05:29:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9DADA16A4CE; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7FB7643D45; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mux@freebsd.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920)
	id 7CDDA5C7B2; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 05:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:29:56 +0200
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20040416122956.GG19602@elvis.mu.org>
References: <200404112136.i3BLaVxM099406@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20040416122017.GB64995@tara.freenix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040416122017.GB64995@tara.freenix.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys mount.h src/lib/libc/gen Makefile.inc
	getvfsent.3 getvfsent.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:29:56 -0000

Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Maxime Henrion:
> >   Log:
> >   Belatedly remove the getvfsent(3) API.  All the consumers have been
> >   updated to use getvfsbyname(3) or the vfs.conflist sysctl since a
> >   long time, except mount_smbfs(8) which has just been fixed.
> 
> This is a change of interface meaning that we need to bump up the major
> number of libc...

I believe bumping the major number of libc for that would be way overkill.
As far as I know, there are no consumers of this API outside of the tree,
and I would actually be surprised if there was any.  I already bumped
__FreeBSD_version for this change and it looks sufficient to me.  Can
you explain why you think a major number bump of libc is in order here?

Cheers,
Maxime