From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 6 19:57:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D3EE4060E for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 19:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C276DBA7 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 19:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v96K1IJB063845 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:01:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: <42d09435-072d-d196-1822-bb5c603b49af@madpilot.net> References: <20171006131146.qswg2barkhelii4n@ivaldir.net>, <42d09435-072d-d196-1822-bb5c603b49af@madpilot.net> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: [RFC] less patches: control the PATH Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 13:01:24 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <8dbf23b2be5840966f7e67f86971ecbd@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 19:57:03 -0000 On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:24:04 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote > On 10/06/2017 15:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a patch to add a new feature I am willing to get for a while: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12603 > > > A user can control which binary will be found in the PATH of the build > > sequences easily by adding > > BINARY_RENAME= source target > > > PS2: the BINARY_RENAME variable name sucks, any better name is welcome :) > > > > Suggestions from the top of my head: > > BINARY_ALIAS > > PROGRAM_ALIAS > > EXECUTABLE_ALIAS > > COMMAND_ALIAS > > (Yes I think "alias" expresses the concept better) +1 IMHO I think /mentally/ ALIAS really "nails it". :) --Chris > > -- > Guido Falsi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"