Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 13:56:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@unixhelp.org> To: Doug <Doug@gorean.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@yes.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bpfilter -> bpf patches [LONG] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907031355080.35867-100000@janus.syracuse.net> In-Reply-To: <377E431F.D04C3BE9@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >
> > [Bcc:ed to net, committers; please follow up on hackers]
> >
> > Attached are patches for renaming 'pseudo-device bpfilter' to
> > 'peudo-device bpf', courtesy of glimpse(1) and ed(1). LINT and GENERIC
> > build fine with these patches; I haven't tried to run a kernel built
> > with them, though. Also, although I caught and corrected a few spacing
> > nits caused by chopping off five letters, there may be some I didn't
> > catch.
> >
> > If no-one objects, I'll commit this to -CURRENT in a few days.
>
> Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but are there any circumstances
> where naming the kernel include file "bpf.h" would conflict with
> /usr/include/net/bpf.h?
>
> In any case, this is a long overdue, and welcome change. Thank you. :)
>
> Doug
How would that conflict? "bpf.h" is a local include, so it's not the same
include path set. Plus, it would only be included as <bpf.h> if -I/sys/net.
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
green@FreeBSD.org _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9907031355080.35867-100000>