From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 09:19:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5B9106566C for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10E58FC15 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KG9M6-0004jz-Ha; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:19:28 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.238]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KG9M5-0001zm-S1; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:19:26 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m689JPB9009253; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:19:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m689JOKB009252; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:19:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:19:24 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: gerald@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20080708091924.GA9171@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.org Subject: lang/gcc42 on alpha X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:19:30 -0000 Hi I've been using lang/gcc42 on alpha for more than a year now. My calculation shows that the port was updated 25 times during last year. Each time I upgraded the port with no problem, except for as failure, which happens on my i386 just the same: +pid 3154 (as), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) +pid 3160 (as), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) +pid 33039 (as), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) +pid 33045 (as), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) Accordingly I wonder why lang/gcc42 is still marked NOT_FOR_ARCHS= alpha Are there other alpha users who have trouble with this port? If you don't think removing NOT_FOR_ARCHS is justified, perhaps you could change it to .if !defined(NOT_FOR_ARCHS) NOT_FOR_ARCHS= alpha .endif so that I can put NOT_FOR_ARCHS= '' in my make.conf and avoid having to edit the Makefile each upgrade. many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423