From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 9 14:20:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from spider.pilosoft.com (p55-222.acedsl.com [160.79.55.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511CC37B401; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:20:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (alexmail@localhost) by spider.pilosoft.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA17273; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:23:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:23:02 -0500 (EST) From: Alex Pilosov To: Chris Dillon Cc: Dan Nelson , Bill Paul , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: call for testers: port aggregation netgraph module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Chris Dillon wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Dan Nelson wrote: > Cool, if thats all it will take, I'll give it a try. But, whatever > method Compaq/Intel is using doesn't require me to set up the ports on > the switch as being part of a trunk. It "just works". And IIRC, when Its not real trunking. Your incoming traffic will still come on a single link, only outbound traffic will be shared. (Or at least that's how I think compaq stuff will work). > I actually tried to set the ports on the 3COM switch up as trunk > ports, it didn't work right. Maybe 3COM is doing something entirely > different. Prolly. FEC is cisco-specific thingy, like ISL... -alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message