From nobody Wed Aug 3 04:24:54 2022 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4LyJfy6MZcz4YZkv for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 04:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LyJfx6Vxgz3qjD for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 04:24:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org) Received: from [IPV6:2a01:e34:ef45:d440::1baa:cc5b] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:ef45:d440::1baa:cc5b]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AED113F895 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 06:24:54 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------o4EXp4dWeXZkYkfjn3bYyWf5" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 06:24:54 +0200 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: wx31-gtk3-3.1.5_2 Content-Language: fr To: ports@freebsd.org References: <31C8A78A-2E51-4D15-A04E-6BC3CB1CD594@bluetiehome.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lo=c3=afc_Bartoletti?= In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4LyJfx6Vxgz3qjD X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=neutral (mx1.freebsd.org: 212.27.42.3 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org) smtp.mailfrom=lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.47 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_MIXED_CHARSET(0.62)[subject]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tuxfamily.org: no valid DMARC record]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.27.42.3:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12322, ipnet:212.27.32.0/19, country:FR]; R_SPF_NEUTRAL(0.00)[?all:c]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[lbartoletti]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------o4EXp4dWeXZkYkfjn3bYyWf5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, Le 02/08/2022 à 10:57, Fernando Apesteguía a écrit : > Op 2 aug. 2022, om 00:16 heeft Space Cadet het > volgende geschreven: >>> Yes, I can do it. Have never done it before, please point me to guidance. Would the new port be called wx32-gtk3-3.1.5_2 ? >>> >> I reckon the name should reflect the latest version - something akin to wx32-gtk3-3.2.0. > There is the port and there is the package. The port should probably > be just wxgtk32. But please, coordinate this with desktop@ since all > wxgtk ports are maintained by them (except wxgtk28-contrib) Thanks to VVD, we're working on it https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265093 >> Perhaps one or more of the older ports should be deprecated or moved out of the ports catalogue: >> >> wx28-gtk2-2.8.12_10 >> wx30-gtk3-3.0.5.1_1 >> wx31-gtk3-3.1.5_2 >> >> the 3.1.5 version was considered by the wx developers to be a development port. The former stable port is 3.0.5, the stable one before that is 2.8, referred to as “Ancient stable”, dates back to 2006/2011. > There are some ports that still need older versions of wxwidgets. We > would need to update them to newer versions of the toolkit or > deprecate them as well. Some ports can't be updated to wx32 at the moment. But yes, the plan is to deprecate wx31. We'll use wx30 and wx32. Regards, Loïc --------------o4EXp4dWeXZkYkfjn3bYyWf5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

Le 02/08/2022 à 10:57, Fernando Apesteguía a écrit :
Op 2 aug. 2022, om 00:16 heeft Space Cadet <tootall79@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven: 
Yes, I can do it.  Have never done it before, please point me to guidance.  Would the new port be called wx32-gtk3-3.1.5_2 ?


I reckon the name should reflect the latest version - something akin to wx32-gtk3-3.2.0.

There is the port and there is the package. The port should probably
be just wxgtk32. But please, coordinate this with desktop@ since all
wxgtk ports are maintained by them (except wxgtk28-contrib)

Thanks to VVD, we're working on it https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265093 

Perhaps one or more of the older ports  should be deprecated or moved out of the ports catalogue:

wx28-gtk2-2.8.12_10
wx30-gtk3-3.0.5.1_1
wx31-gtk3-3.1.5_2

the 3.1.5 version was considered by the wx developers to be a development port. The former stable port is 3.0.5, the stable one before that is 2.8, referred to as “Ancient stable”, dates back to 2006/2011.

There are some ports that still need older versions of wxwidgets. We
would need to update them to newer versions of the toolkit or
deprecate them as well.


Some ports can't be updated to wx32 at the moment. But yes, the plan is to deprecate wx31. We'll use wx30 and wx32.

Regards,

Loïc


  
  


--------------o4EXp4dWeXZkYkfjn3bYyWf5--