From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Aug 30 23:10:03 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA23519
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 23:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au [129.78.129.109])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA23486
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 23:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dawes@localhost) by rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA03504; Sat, 31 Aug 1996 16:09:41 +1000
From: David Dawes <dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199608310609.QAA03504@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Has anyone run x11perf on 2.1.5-RELEASE?
To: sef@Kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 16:09:41 +1000 (EST)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199608310557.WAA21903@kithrup.com> from "Sean Eric Fagan" at Aug 30, 96 10:57:07 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>That particular operation isn't accelerated (for format != ZPixmap),
>>and it is falling back to the extremely slow machine-independent code.
>>So far it hasn't annoyed anyone enough for them to do something about
>>it :-(.
>
>So, while running x11perf, the X Server is *SUPPOSED* to slow down and
>eventually die when I try to move the mouse?

It isn't supposed to die (although it often looks dead in this situation).

David