From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 10 21:25:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA02842 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 21:25:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02821 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 21:24:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA24064; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 22:24:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id WAA04178; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 22:24:12 -0600 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 22:24:12 -0600 Message-Id: <199808110424.WAA04178@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mike Smith Cc: Drew Derbyshire , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: zp0 not receiving under 2.2.7? In-Reply-To: <199808110254.TAA01735@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <35CFB07F.C786C7BA@kew.com> <199808110254.TAA01735@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Hmmm. One more try, change the "?" to the explicit IRQ I want ... WHAMMO, > > ep0 works. Well, *was* "?" legal? > > It's not so much whether it's legal as whether it works. I don't like > ? because the smarts behind the auto-IRQ allocation aren't good. We > don't do enough PnP by far for it to be reliable. However, they're do a better job of guessing an available IRQ than most users. :) :) :) (I'm being both serious and attempting to be funny at the same time...) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message