From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 15 23:41:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BF937B404 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 23:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (mta05-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5C843FA3 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 23:41:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([81.103.196.4]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20030516064154.MOUK311.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk>; Fri, 16 May 2003 07:41:54 +0100 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20030516073557.01e053b8@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 07:41:43 +0100 To: Terry Lambert , Garance A Drosihn From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <3EC485F8.2BDF90B8@mindspring.com> References: <3EC2FB53.67559AB6@bellatlantic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a public relations opportunity for BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 06:42:00 -0000 At 23:32 15/05/2003 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: >If you can buy a copy of the SCO Linux product before it's >no longer available, do it: the legal theory that made them >withdraw the offer for sale of the product was that their >sale of it under the GPL granted royalty free license to >use their IP contained therein with no royalty, in perpetuity. I'm not aware of any legal theory which makes it possible to grant someone a license by mistake. Providing that someone from SCO stands up in court and says "as soon as we realized that our proprietary code had been inserted into the linux project we were distributing, we stopped distributing it", I think any reasonable court would rule that their code had not been licensed under the GPL. Colin Percival