From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Apr 23 12:48: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.79.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B0F37BACC; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 12:47:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.79.115]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA28428; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:47:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA08296; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:47:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:47:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Matthew Dillon , "Rodney W. Grimes" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday In-Reply-To: <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com> <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Core should consider reverting the special rules that were originally > > created with the expectation of major breakage in 5.x back to > > the set of rules we had for 3.x and 4.x. > > I have no idea what special rules you are talking about for 4.x/5.x. > > 4.x-stable is a -stable tree and shall be treated as such. I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable branch (yet). That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message