From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 15 02:08:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7ACD106566C for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danallen46@airwired.net) Received: from mail.utahbroadband.com (mail.utahbroadband.com [204.14.20.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FDD8FC08 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danallen46@airwired.net) Received: (qmail 13778 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jun 2009 00:55:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.18?) (danallen46@airwired.net@66.29.174.6) by mail.utahbroadband.com with ESMTPA; 15 Jun 2009 00:55:54 -0000 Message-Id: From: Dan Allen To: Daniel Eischen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:08:07 -0600 References: <3a142e750906131642n4d00469dh779e54da231bf6d3@mail.gmail.com> <1407C6EC-873D-49AB-9F8C-6A4A6FFA9DC3@airwired.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) Cc: "Paul B. Mahol" , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: Let's back out LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT from STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:08:13 -0000 On 14 Jun 2009, at 5:08 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Dan Allen wrote: > >> # /dev/ad0s2: >> 8 partitions: >> # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] >> a: 43591708 2097152 4.2BSD 0 0 0 >> b: 2097152 0 swap >> c: 45688860 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, >> don't edit > > Seems weird to see swap at offset 0 and partition a after swap. > I wonder if that is screwing things up. And shouldn't the offset > for your first slice start at offset 188747685 (from fdisk)? Interesting insights. I forgot to mention that there may be some discrepancies that are a remnant of reinstalling the OS many times. (Now I know I could have used the loader.old trick...) Anyway, while doing this a dozen times in a couple of days I learned that I could speed things by not doing newfs(8) each time, so the fsize and bsize fields are definitely messed up. Yet things seem to work fine. Weird. My next experiment is to redo the disk entirely. Dan