From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 8 16:34:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE5C16A549 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kael.fischer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF59243D80 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:27:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kael.fischer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so736744uge for ; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:28:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=LTdynyLRYW3Wx/2JZVbvZ5b2XiOaC1xq777vCQEnq6TBMaSHKxJlrWA7i/LKj+KjtoJOO9SpkWAt2/zDdmyp80pZvYF94MZROxjFDzT5CUqasLeTNXutambh9Mj6Np3AXtVsDIx/iPFe+4o5pwbWkScGXYmt3QikBV4EZRbm/4Q= Received: by 10.78.157.8 with SMTP id f8mr1778452hue.1165595298478; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:28:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.155.15 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 08:28:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 08:28:18 -0800 From: "Kael Fischer" To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: ldexpf in 6.x amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kael@sonic.net List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:34:35 -0000 I have 14 intel blades running 6.0-R. ldexpf is missing on these systems (ldexp, and ldexpd are in libm.so). I know this has come up before on various lists, but I am looking for a little clarification. 1) here is a patch that Steve Kargl proposed on freebsd-current last year. Is this going to do the trick?: --- /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c.orig Mon Dec 5 13:29:47 2005 +++ /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_scalbf.c Mon Dec 5 13:28:53 2005 @@ -42,3 +42,5 @@ return scalbnf(x,(int)fn); #endif } + +__weak_reference(scalbf, ldexpf); 2) is 'cd /usr/src/lib/msun; make' sufficient to rebuild libm.so ? Thanks, Kael