From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 29 21:27:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA02779 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 21:27:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat1262.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.186.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02771 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 21:27:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA01530; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 01:27:13 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 01:27:13 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: Andre Oppermann cc: "Steven P. Donegan" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOW/MOSIX/Beowulf In-Reply-To: <3689B28A.E73F3B5E@pipeline.ch> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 30 Dec 1998, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Steven P. Donegan wrote: > > > > On a completely different subject :-) > > > > Given FreeBSD-current's performance, and SMP capabilities, has anyone > > addressed using FreeBSD in a Network-Of-Workstations/MOSIX/Beowulf style > > baby supercomputer? MOSIX (last time I checked) was BSDI only. Any > > thoughts? I'm looking at highly scalable email/ldap applications. > > Check out our work: http://www.nrg4u.com > > It's an LDAP enabling Qmail patch and qmail in itself is highly > scalable. A new patch release is on the way. Okay, I'll bite...*what* does this have to do with the question posed? Marc G. Fournier Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message