From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Tue Nov 22 22:14:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15878C4F5C9 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:14:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.marec@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF0D1DC2 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:14:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.marec@davenulle.org) Received: from dmarec.local ([86.199.68.25]) by mwinf5d61 with ME id BAER1u00k0YigXJ03AEStJ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 23:14:27 +0100 X-ME-Helo: dmarec.local X-ME-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 23:14:27 +0100 X-ME-IP: 86.199.68.25 Subject: Re: RTL 8111G To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <582AEEAE.2030702@systella.fr> <58341ECB.8080605@systella.fr> From: David Marec Message-ID: <66187adb-2240-e63f-3800-b454cd4cbc0b@davenulle.org> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 23:14:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58341ECB.8080605@systella.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:14:37 -0000 On 22.11.2016 11:32, BERTRAND Joël wrote: > > Anyone ? Does someone try to use this kind of ethernet controller ? I m currently running FreeBSD 11 ( after running 10.3 one season ), with this chipset embedded on the motherboard (MSI H81M-P33) . I didn't encounter any issue, but I mostly use this system as a desktop. While, at times, It runs a whole night long, to receive zfs backups from remote servers. Even then, I didn't notice anything that may have gone wrong. Just in case, to pass through the failure on 'M_DONTWAIT', you have to replace this flag with the /new/ (FreeBSD 9) mbuf allocation parameter: M_NOWAIT. But doing so, I guess you'll trigger a error related to another interface evolution. -- David Marec