From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 18 8:46:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua [212.9.224.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD97137B419; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 08:46:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipcard.iptcom.net (ipcard.iptcom.net [212.9.224.5]) by alcatraz.iptelecom.net.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA75125; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:45:55 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from vega.vega.com (h44.229.dialup.iptcom.net [212.9.229.44]) by ipcard.iptcom.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA49684; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:45:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vega.vega.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2IGjI101580; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:45:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3C9619DF.C5691B4B@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:46:23 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,uk,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Pentchev Cc: Will Andrews , ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-xfree86@lists.csociety.org Subject: Re: FW: cvs commit: ports/x11/XFree86-4 Makefile Makefile.man pkg-plist pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.pc98 ports/x11/XFree86-4/files patch-2 patch-c patch-c2 patch-d patch-f patch-i810 patch-j patch-k patch-mouse patch-r128 patch-r128dri patch-r128xmesa patch-shm References: <20020316235108.GE53073@squall.waterspout.com> <20020318183503.C10603@straylight.oblivion.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 06:51:08PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > > With this commit, we have XFree86 4.2.0 in our ports tree. > > Please report problems to me asap. I am doing a clean checkout > > on another machine and running another test to catch any mistakes > > that I might have made at commit time. > > Would it be a very Bad Thing(tm) if the meta-port pulled in > the Cyrillic fonts, too? Yes, I do realize that those may > be installed as easily as a 'make install', or as a pkg_add -r, > but still - is there a good reason that this is the only font set > of all those provided in x11-fonts/XFree86-4-font* that is not > installed by default? :) I don't think it would take up too much > disk space or anything, and it would certainly be convenient for > Slavic FreeBSD users to have it pulled in, too :) I agree with Peter, especially considering that Cyrillic fonts was distributed with XFree86 megaport since beginning of the time. We shouldn't not break POLA. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message