From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 15 17:29:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650EB1065675; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E7A8FC12; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1FHThZw033411; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1FHTgu7033408; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:42 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Glen Barber In-Reply-To: <20120215041158.GC1862@glenbarber.us> Message-ID: References: <20120215040311.GB1862@glenbarber.us> <20120215041158.GC1862@glenbarber.us> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:29:43 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CfR: config chapter changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:29:45 -0000 On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:03:11PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: >>> @@ -547,11 +548,8 @@ >>> day of the week. All these fields must be numeric values, and follow >>> the twenty-four hour clock. The who field is special, >>> and only exists in the /etc/crontab file. >>> - This field specifies which user the command should be run as. >>> - When a user installs his or her crontab file, they >>> - will not have this option. Finally, the command >>> option is listed. >>>> - This is the last field, so naturally it should designate the command >>> - to be executed. >>> + This field specifies which user the command should be run >>> + as. The last field is the command to be executed. >> >> Grammar nit: What do you think about "This field specifies the user >> root under which the command should run." ? >> > > Wording issue on my part. What I meant was: "This field specifies the > user under which root should invoke the command." How about "user as which root will run the command."