Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Feb 2004 13:27:16 +0100
From:      Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject:   Re: sane
Message-ID:  <20040201132716.295f5a24@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040131.105803.64523683.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20040131.105803.64523683.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:58:03 -0700 (MST)
"M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:

> Is there any reason why sane-backend, and depend ports depend on the
> gettext-old port instead of the gettext port?  Changing these in a few

Because Trevor changed all ports which previously depended on gettext to
depend upon getext-old and nobody cared to check if it works with the
new one or not.

> places seems to make it build OK and doesn't conflict with the other
> ports that I have installed in my tree that want the new version
> (unless I'm just being stupid, and should force the old version to
> install).

The only reason why you should use the old one is: both gettext ports
conflict with each other and as long as you have a lot dependencies on
the old one you can't use the new one. If it works for you, go ahead and
use it.

I think most of the ports committers wait for an official "this is the
way to go" statement from gettext-involved persons.

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
           I will be available to get hired in April 2004.

http://www.Leidinger.net                       Alexander @ Leidinger.net
  GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91  3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040201132716.295f5a24>