From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 18 08:13:13 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E941065868
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:13:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4F58FC1E
	for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:13:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38AD3F129;
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:13:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1I8DFdt018685;
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:13:15 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:19:55 PST."
	<B0DD65C3-4792-47C4-9BBE-E33BD58EA537@mac.com> 
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:13:15 +0000
Message-ID: <18684.1234944795@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>,
	FreeBSD current mailing list <current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: boot0cfg -s vs. GEOM_PART_*? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:13:14 -0000

In message <B0DD65C3-4792-47C4-9BBE-E33BD58EA537@mac.com>, Marcel Moolenaar wri
tes:

>I'll consider this.
>
> From my perspective:
>
>o   The fact that we have a separate OAM interface that
>     doesn't use file descriptors (at the application
>     level), having to use ioctl(2) all of a sudden is...
>     well... odd. Likewise for regular read/write. Just
>     for boot code do we need o worry about mapping GEOM
>     names to device special files.

You can use g_ctl instead of ioctl if you want, it just
does not belong in the xml.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.