From owner-freebsd-user-groups  Tue Jul 18 10:49:53 1995
Return-Path: user-groups-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA02240
          for user-groups-outgoing; Tue, 18 Jul 1995 10:49:53 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA02224
          ; Tue, 18 Jul 1995 10:49:45 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA05911; Tue, 18 Jul 1995 10:49:06 -0700
Message-Id: <199507181749.KAA05911@time.cdrom.com>
To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@kryten.Atinc.COM>
cc: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>, Jordan K Hubbard <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>,
        Branson Matheson <branson@dvals1.larc.nasa.gov>,
        user-groups@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: coordination 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jul 1995 10:22:46 EDT."
             <Pine.3.89.9507181022.B28875-0100000@kryten.atinc.com> 
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 10:49:05 -0700
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: user-groups-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 	cool!  another user's group.   who is doing group to group 

My reaction as well!  If I visit, can I do the Schotz brewery tour
and put a rubber glove on the assembly line? :-)

> coordination for user groups efforts in contributing to FreeBSD.

I'm not sure that any such coordination is necessary.  If they want to
contribute, they know who to talk to (hackers, current or core).  If
they want to do a group project, then the only coordination they need
is internal.  Or am I missing the meaning of your suggestion?  That's
always possible!

					Jordan