From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 18 14:34:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB220106568F for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:34:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f227.google.com (mail-fx0-f227.google.com [209.85.220.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0268FC1A for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so1299415fxm.3 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:34:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=x8NfuleJ5rB3/Jpwy1vc/6IFdcRo6OWLlnZYKkiPzw4=; b=KTfYLnE5ZsCN2oQ2HS3SuETr7KVeiXzwUUb+p8u3Y/26CpXjEh62ij5K0QWhh+qY9P uyTbGxH4Y9Oh+4EV9TMjHxUjugpXKM6Qp085fzmm9L3k6gD6hWWTa2BZjjGu5qpki4Ll mzoyveK40IdvgB7ZOSmcsOeyALG/wn/G4R9UY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=m7JEyh4oSFpUwGiu3g21HKRHe94KxGGNgdPKbkhWfvIjmB38x4jTe+45SHqcsAGNCM xXggOYOdRIK5NEcAXkQJyvDfCZCkS6AeFdpTPdcQvxSXtuPX9lhInl6teMwX1ZFoTnjd GxowEuxXZjq3Z18ZwwkgQ110CkT/uvNI8pak8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.235.5 with SMTP id i5mr5250726muh.36.1258554890281; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:34:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <200911172027.15749.gnemmi@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:34:50 -0300 Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0911180634h2484d4d7seedc1611c7e218f2@mail.gmail.com> From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: WITHOUT_TELNET=yes .. does it work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:34:51 -0000 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Gonzalo Nemmi wrote: > > WITHOUT_FLOOPY=yes > > Just a note - are you sure this is correct? > Dear Eitan: Up to a second ago I was .. now you are making me have second toughts .. I'm using that line on my notebook, wich doesn't have a floopy drive ... Would you advice me not to use that line, and could you tell me why? (really honest question ... I mean maybe WITHOUT_FLOOPY=yes interferes with something else that I'm not aware of) Thanks for your answer Best Regards