From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Oct 25 03:25:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id DAA07160 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 03:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA07115 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 03:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.225.2]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id AAA15613 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA09660 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:00:15 +0100 Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA07198 for freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com; Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:05:08 +0100 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 09:05:08 +0100 From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <199610250805.JAA07198@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: pgcc - benefits? Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I built pgcc yesterday trying to squeeze a few more percent performance improvement for a physics program I'm running here on a P6. How reliable is pgcc? Where lie it's strengths? BTW, trying to build a kernel using pgcc gives the following error: -DINET -DKERNEL ../../kern/kern_clock.c machine/cpufunc.h: In function `hardclock': machine/cpufunc.h:331: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm' machine/cpufunc.h:331: inconsistent operand constraints in an `asm' *** Error code 1 Stop. NB: the PATCH_SITE doesn't carry the pgcc patches anymore. During build they were fetched from freebsd.org/distfiles. --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de