From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Wed Sep 14 16:02:32 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65459BDAB27
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:02:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pipfstarrd@openmailbox.org)
Received: from smtp1.openmailbox.org (smtp16.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.50])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A0A61567
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:02:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from pipfstarrd@openmailbox.org)
Received: by mail.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 20002)
 id 489FE202423; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:56:31 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1473868591;
 bh=PHR8gWjoQMEqhs0G/qOMkNZJhnRIy9btSgO11P5O2a0=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=QElH6FoQ3gJipShiNTrusA18H6No8tjzyqYlwn6T8N+V1xGv0qURtlAHFxmmJNMCi
 LIFiXNGA9vH5PuzZr76Te4NghAQBOl1+zb1pMahkJSUMERVyYI4XAhPtbC6rJkIIAu
 hWoltuDKERSsNx4TvJ9fBpdiuqr/7m4DAFP3NYug=
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on h4
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RECEIVED,
 NO_RELAYS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Subject: Re: Is replacing alloca(3) where possible a good thing to do?
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1473868591;
 bh=PHR8gWjoQMEqhs0G/qOMkNZJhnRIy9btSgO11P5O2a0=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=QElH6FoQ3gJipShiNTrusA18H6No8tjzyqYlwn6T8N+V1xGv0qURtlAHFxmmJNMCi
 LIFiXNGA9vH5PuzZr76Te4NghAQBOl1+zb1pMahkJSUMERVyYI4XAhPtbC6rJkIIAu
 hWoltuDKERSsNx4TvJ9fBpdiuqr/7m4DAFP3NYug=
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <d192dbeb-5647-e552-9db1-b478aa7ac057@FreeBSD.org>
 <bd0607f1-2224-02db-e430-6c34e42297bf@freebsd.org>
From: twilight <pipfstarrd@openmailbox.org>
Message-ID: <f71ce065-0994-9deb-2457-544f90a26105@openmailbox.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:56:49 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bd0607f1-2224-02db-e430-6c34e42297bf@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:02:32 -0000

> The one time I tried to use it, it went very badly, as it returns a
> pointer, but the actual amount of memory was less than I had requested,
> and so it smashed everything.

That is a known issue with alloca, so it shouldn't be used with big
amounts of memory (it creates objects on stack, so stack overflow can be
reached easily).

But, well, creating a really big array would do the same. Also, deep
recursion will also smash the stack.

So we don't have a deal like "remove alloca and your stack will be
safe". But still, it's obsolete and compiler dependent. I'd better not
stick to it.
-- 
Cheers~

PGP key fingerprint:
07B3 2177 3E27 BF41 DC65  CC95 BDA8 88F1 E9F9 CEEF

You can retrieve my public key at pgp.mit.edu.