From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 1 17:33:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E0D16A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:33:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B46543D2D for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:33:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (e4eaab2ea723a0bff54481a81cd94085@adsl-67-115-73-128.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.73.128]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i520WFSC023809; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F3A8A524C9; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 17:33:39 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Luke Message-ID: <20040602003339.GA8133@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040601225922.GA20044@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cap on network speed in CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:33:41 -0000 --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 05:29:44PM -0700, Luke wrote: > I've forced both full and half duplexing and gotten the same results both= =20 > ways. I certainly won't rule out bad hardware. I just don't know how to= =20 > troubleshoot this. > Would disabling "witness" help? I've read that "witness" can slow down= =20 > some things, but I don't know if network speed is one of them. Holy god, yes. Kris --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAvSBjWry0BWjoQKURAk0VAJ9mxjNkxLA5Pwp2Lvk7YwReCamBeQCeKJHj BmLsETb/NDJTUUZLx79Ul3U= =OQfa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--