From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 1 12: 7:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from almso1.proxy.att.com (almso1.att.com [192.128.167.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5911503C for ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 12:07:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from myevmenkin@att.com) Received: from mo3980r1.ems.att.com ([135.38.12.14]) by almso1.proxy.att.com (AT&T IPNS/MSO-2.2) with ESMTP id PAA15360; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 15:07:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from njb140bh1.ems.att.com by mo3980r1.ems.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/ATTEMS-1.4.1 sol2) id PAA14990; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 15:04:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by njb140bh1.ems.att.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 15:07:15 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO" To: "'Warren Welch'" Cc: "'hackers@FreeBSD.org'" Subject: RE: VTun... Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 15:07:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, [...] > I notice that you support traffic shaping. I was wondering > if you plan to > offer support for slower than 8KBytes / sec (64Kbits/s). Everything should be there ;) > What I'd like to be able to do, is create some tunnels to my > end points, > and then using the firewall / routing software, do policy > routing. (ie: > telnet goes over this tunnel, and is traffic shaped to > 1KByte/s, while web > traffic goes over another tunnel, and is allocated the > remainder of the > available bandwidth.) In this way, I'd be able to guarantee > a certain > amount of BW to core services such as telnet, without letting > things like > SMTP or web impact on services... Yes, you can do it. I think Max is going to release new version of VTUN very soon. Best regards, eMax. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message