Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 09:41:58 +0000 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>, Jase Thew <jase@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Question about new options framework (regression?) Message-ID: <20120727094158.GC29866@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <201207261441.q6QEfAY9002147@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <501151A8.7000901@FreeBSD.org> <201207261441.q6QEfAY9002147@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:41:10PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: >=20 > Jase Thew wrote: > > On 25/07/2012 23:57, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > because the priority goes to global to specific and the most specifi= c is the > > > options file. > > >=20 > > > if most people want the options file to not have the final priority,= why not, > > > can others spread their opinion here? > >=20 > > I can't see why it would be of benefit for saved options to override > > anything passed to make (either env or as an arg), as one of the reaso= ns > > you're likely to be passing them is to override any saved settings in > > the first place. > >=20 > > Please consider reverting back to the established and I daresay, > > expected behaviour. >=20 > I agree with Jase. >=20 > Actually I'm not sure if PORTS_DBDIR should override make.conf > or vice versa. I don't know which one should be regarded as > more specific. >=20 > But anything specified on the commandline is definitely more > specific than PORTS_DBDIR and should override anything else. >=20 > One way to do that would be to introduce another pair of > variables, e.g. OVERRIDE_SET and OVERRIDE_UNSET, so you could > type: make OVERRIDE_SET=3DSTATIC >=20 I think that is the more reasonnable, I'll add this when fully back. I was thinking of LATE_SET and LATE_UNSET but OVERRIDE_SET and OVERRIDE_UNSET sou= nds better to me. regards, Bapt --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlASYmYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyPRQCgwmbTpIS3DXmPwXiEymYAmDH1 yucAn0l5G/VZHH+K8oD3wd1Rc1j2qNjA =4WqL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120727094158.GC29866>