From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Aug 20  6:30:46 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BDB14BFA
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 06:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 11Hojp-0006jS-00; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:29:45 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Cillian Sharkey <cillian@baker.ie>
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Change to /sys/net/if.c & /sys/dev/syscons/syscons.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100."
             <37BD61B7.F4C2CD28@baker.ie> 
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:29:45 +0200
Message-ID: <25881.935155785@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:

> +               log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n",
> +                   ifp->if_name, ifp->if_unit);

You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)

So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
"enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts?

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message