From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 8 6:37:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C272737B403 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 06:37:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tsikora@home.com) Received: from home.com ([24.2.168.159]) by femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010708133729.JWMJ17777.femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com@home.com> for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 06:37:29 -0700 Message-ID: <3B486150.BF030CCC@home.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 09:34:08 -0400 From: Ted Sikora Reply-To: tsikora@powerusersbbs.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en-US, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: JFS References: <3B479008.19BFE7F2@home.com> <101770000.994546208@vpn39.ece.cmu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" wrote: > > On Saturday, July 07, 2001 18:41:12 -0400, Ted Sikora > wrote: > +----- > | Juha Saarinen wrote: > | > > | > On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Dave Uhring wrote: > | > > | > > I use "logging" on Solaris and XFS on Linux and have tried reiserfs on > | > > Linux. All are superior to UFS/softupdates when the going gets tough. > | > > Disk access times may or may not be comparable with UFS/softupdates, > | > > but the integrity of my filesystems is more important than raw speed. > | > > | > Hmmm... that's one reason I've not implemented ReiserFS on my Linux box. > | > Read too many horror stories about how it eats your file system, and how > | > it doesn't work with NFS etc. > | > | Absolutely false. Works perfectly... I have had it on several machines > +--->8 > > I think it depends on which ReiserFS you're using: the development > snapshots that show up in various kernels from Linus or as patches to same, I was using 2.2.x but ocassionally used the 2.4.x kernels. I now have the 2.4.5 kernel with the super.c patch on all. The only problem I have is the following error message on boot-up 'UMSDOS: msdos_read_super failed, mount aborted'. (always existed on 2.4) but is harmless. -- Ted Sikora admin@unixos2.org http://www.unixos2.org http://www.powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message