From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 3 2: 2:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250F337B401; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 02:02:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from hun.org (hun.org [216.190.27.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96DF43E42; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 02:02:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from attila@hun.org) Received: by hun.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 482465741D; Sun, 3 Nov 2002 10:02:56 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 10:02:56 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: <20021103100256.oc6T34031@hun.org> From: Daniel Flickinger X-Mailer: AttilaMail with XEmacs & Postfix on FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-Ballistic: N 37.218497 W 113.614979 X-Address: 31 N 700 E, St George UT 84770-3028 X-Squawk: (435) 680-0750 X-No-Archive: yes X-Tags: Sanity is the Playground for the Unimaginative In-Reply-To: <20021101085533.GB19170@sunbay.com> References: <20021101072304.sAZL15425@hun.org> <20021101132539.B85578@kayak.xcllnt.net> To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , FreeBSD-CURRENT Subject: Re: another include failure to find in buildworld Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name="text" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sent: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:55:33 +0200 by Ruslan: + I'm not seeing this breakage. At what stage of buildworld + do you see it? (buildworld builds special versions of + compiler and cross tools that honour the TOOLS_PREFIX which + is set to WORLDTMP during world-related stages of + buildworld: includes, libraries, depend, and all. Ruslan and Marcel: The problem is that it is time slice dependent; it only shows if /usr/include/uuid.h has not been installed from a prior installworld. At this point I am relatively convinced it is a make -j # issue, eg: one part of the make is ahead of another from the lack of a specific dependency. As long as the -j option is available, it will be used. On my SMP Athlon with 160 MB/sec 10,000 RPM dual SCSIs capable of sustained 30-50 MB/sec file transfers, the problem is probably aggravated. I wonder whether it is more important to consider the make synchronization or more rigorous dependencies? Either way, we have more important eggs to fry getting to 5.0R. I'm not going to worry about dependency errors which can be solved with a 'make buildincludes installincludes' and will not report errors which can be so solved. Thanks for taking the time to look at this. Daniel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message