From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Jun 21 10:54:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA02914
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 10:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from riverside.mr.net (root@Riverside.MR.Net [137.192.2.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA02870
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 10:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from galileo.mr.net by riverside.mr.net (8.7.5/SMI-4.1.R931202)
	id MAA19355; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 12:54:21 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from black@localhost) by galileo.mr.net (8.7.2/8.7.2) id MAA15764; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 12:54:12 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 12:54:12 -0500 (CDT)
From: Ben Black <black@MR.Net>
Message-Id: <199606211754.MAA15764@galileo.mr.net>
To: black@MR.Net, kline@tera.com
Subject: Re: LFS anyone?
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-MD5: Hn/e1To8eHz4/fO5abBJrQ==
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

There is plenty of documentation about LFS in the PhD thesis of it's author.  
She implemented it for 4.4BSD.  I was more concerned with practical issues of 
code stability and initializing an LFS partition.


Ben
black@mr.net

> According to Ben Black:
> > Is anyone using LFS and if so how well does it work and how do I newfs a
> > partition to support it?
> > 
> > 
> 
> 	I'll second this question and follow up by asking if
> 	anyone can post some information about the FFS and the
> 	Log Filesystem.  ((Does the LFS exist in the BSD world?))
> 
> 	Seems like the LFS would make fsck's obsolete.  Yes? No?
> 
> 	Clues?
> 
> 	gary kline
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
>