From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 25 03:49:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8ED816A420 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 03:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BEB43D67 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 03:49:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: (qmail 24812 invoked by uid 207); 25 Nov 2005 03:49:38 -0000 Received: from keramida@linux.gr by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.30/3.97. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.191):. Processed in 0.40811 secs); 25 Nov 2005 03:49:38 -0000 Received: from dialup191.ach.sch.gr (HELO flame.pc) ([81.186.70.191]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 25 Nov 2005 03:49:37 -0000 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAP3n6IX016868; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 05:49:06 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jAP3n34c016867; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 05:49:03 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@linux.gr) Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 05:49:02 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Jeremie Le Hen Message-ID: <20051125034902.GA16834@flame.pc> References: <20051121162544.GB94958@freebsd.czest.pl> <20051124193052.GU1006@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051124193052.GU1006@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Cc: "Wojciech A. Koszek" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linking basesystem with additional libraries. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 03:49:52 -0000 On 2005-11-24 20:30, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > Is there any reason why we couldn't have LDADD honored in "buildworld" > > process? If there are no negative implications, I volunteer to do the > > work. I'd find it really useful. > > Yes, I'm curious, but could you explain in what way it would be useful ? I'd be interested too. I think the main reason why this would NOT be a good idea is that changing an external library to a newer version can break the buildworld/installworld process in unexpected ways