From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Jun 28 09:09:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA24938 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 09:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pompano.pcola.gulf.net (root@pompano.pcola.gulf.net [198.69.72.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA24933 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 09:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spatula@localhost.gulf.net [127.0.0.1]) by pompano.pcola.gulf.net (8.8.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA04058 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 11:09:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 11:09:08 -0500 (CDT) From: Nick Johnson X-Sender: spatula@pompano.pcola.gulf.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Parity ram Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Is there any particular advantage to using parity ram as far as FreeBSD goes? I'm thinking of replacing my RAM and I'm definitely going to replace my hard drive (I think one of the two is causing my page faulting problems) Also, what's the difference between Parity and True Parity? Nick -- "...some people without brains do an awful lot of talking" -- the Scarecrow (The Wizard of Oz) Nick Johnson, version 1.0 http://www.pcola.gulf.net/~spatula/