From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 30 22:12:55 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7337C106566B;
	Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:12:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:12:45 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <20090429161626.GQ1387@albert.catwhisker.org>
	<200904301727.55099.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<20090430220652.GE61978@albert.catwhisker.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090430220652.GE61978@albert.catwhisker.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200904301812.46985.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Scott Ullrich <sullrich@gmail.com>, pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>,
	Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
Subject: Re: Panic "Fatal trap 18: integer divide fault while in kernel mode"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:12:55 -0000

On Thursday 30 April 2009 06:06 pm, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 05:27:53PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > ...
> > Ah, you're right.  More complete patch is attached.
>
> I was able to test it -- and I manage dto remember to revert
> pluknet's patch :-}.
>
> It works, and as a "bonus," the xl0 NIC is still detected.  (It
> wasn't with pluknet's patch.)

Committed, thanks!

Jung-uk Kim