Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:56:26 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature Request: /usr/local/etc/rc.conf support Message-ID: <20040220185626.GE98277@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040220135811.GM44313@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <87y8qywx47.fsf@gray.impulse.net> <49331.207.23.164.8.1077228664.squirrel@mailtest.sd73.bc.ca> <20040220135811.GM44313@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Feb 20), Bernd Walter said: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:11:04PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > > There's an rc.conf for the base system, why not an rc.conf for the > > ports? Why does a port have to modify anything in the base system's > > etc/? > > You can locally have what you want - just add another rc.conf in your > local configuration. Or another rc.conf.d/, for that matter, and put each port's settings in its own file. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040220185626.GE98277>