Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:19:02 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/typo3 Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <55566889@ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <200908182048.n7IKmBai020473@repoman.freebsd.org> (Martin Wilke's message of "Tue\, 18 Aug 2009 20\:48\:11 %2B0000 \(UTC\)") References: <200908182048.n7IKmBai020473@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> writes: > miwi 2009-08-18 20:48:11 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > www/typo3 Makefile distinfo > Log: > - Update to 4.2.8 > > PR: 137913 > Submitted by: Gerrit Beine <gerrit.beine@gmx.de> (maintainer) It's good when ports are updated to new versions. ;-) However this port removes it's configuration files unconditionally: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/130209 No offence to maintainer/anybody else, I've taken this port occasionally, but the general question is: what shall we do with such behaviour? Should we mark them as broken? -- WBR, bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55566889>