Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Jan 1997 22:02:54 +0100
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: utmp changes
Message-ID:  <Mutt.19970106220254.j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970107015448.davidn@labs.blaze.net.au>; from David Nugent on Jan 7, 1997 01:54:48 %2B1100
References:  <18569.852321999@critter.dk.tfs.com> <199701061401.QAA21728@cantina.clinet.fi> <Mutt.19970107015448.davidn@labs.blaze.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As David Nugent wrote:

> utmp is a different kettle. I can't see it being anything but
> a fixed record field without losing significantly. Either that,
> or the "ttyslot" idea needs to be revisited.

It needs to be revisited anyway.  I think it's an ugly crock that you
are not allowed to shuffle your /etc/ttys file at runtime.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970106220254.j>