Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 22:02:54 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: utmp changes Message-ID: <Mutt.19970106220254.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Mutt.19970107015448.davidn@labs.blaze.net.au>; from David Nugent on Jan 7, 1997 01:54:48 %2B1100 References: <18569.852321999@critter.dk.tfs.com> <199701061401.QAA21728@cantina.clinet.fi> <Mutt.19970107015448.davidn@labs.blaze.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As David Nugent wrote: > utmp is a different kettle. I can't see it being anything but > a fixed record field without losing significantly. Either that, > or the "ttyslot" idea needs to be revisited. It needs to be revisited anyway. I think it's an ugly crock that you are not allowed to shuffle your /etc/ttys file at runtime. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970106220254.j>